Le site "Mémoires juives", outre mes travaux sur les origines de la solution finale, est ma contribution à la Mémoire.
Je dois beaucoup à Madame Sarah HALPERIN Z"al du CDJC (aujourd'hui le Mémorial de la Shoah).
Shmuel LEMARTELEUR, octobre 2011


Figurines nazies. Un site domicilié chez un officier de gendarmerie de Dinéault

Courtoisie de letelegramme.com

Une plainte vient d'être déposée contre un site internet qui vend des figurines nazies. Un site qui renvoie... à l'adresse de l'école de gendarmerie de Dineault, dans le Finistère. Plus précisément à celle d'un logement de fonction : la gérante du site est l'épouse d'un militaire, un lieutenant-colonel de gendarmerie. Une enquête administrative est ouverte.

Sur ce site de vente en ligne, l'internaute peut acheter une figurine de Christopher Reeve en costume de Superman. Mais aussi des statuettes aux effigies d'Hitler ou autres personnages du IIIe Reich, sans compter des uniformes et articles liés au nazisme.


Ce qui a décidé le BNVCA - Bureau national de vigilance contre l'antisémitisme - à déposer une plainte à Quimper. "La loi française précise qu’il est illicite de faire l’apologie de crimes de guerre", rappelle son président, Sammy Gozlan. A sa connaissance, précise t'-il à Libération, ce serait la première fois qu'un site vendant des objets nazis aurait une adresse en France.

Et pas n'importe quelle adresse : Ty Vougeret, à Dineault, près de Châteaulin. Soit l'adresse de l'école de gendarmerie de cette commune du Finistère. Mais, précise l'Armée, le site n'est pas hébergé par l'école de gendarmerie. Plus précisément, souligne t'-elle, le siège social de la société de vente en ligne est domicilié dans un logement de fonction "hors caserne".

Explication ? "La gérante du site est l'épouse d'un militaire de l'armée". En l'occurrence, l'épouse d'un lieutenant-colonel de gendarmerie, qui a enregistré son activité commerciale à Quimper.
Si les autorités militaires insistent sur le fait que "la gendarmerie ne prend aucune part à cette activité", l'Inspection Générale a été saisie. Et une enquête administrative sera menée en interne.

Israël : Des archéologues israéliens découvrent un objet qui confirme les écrits de Hanoucca des pratiques rituelles au Temple de Jérusalem.

Copyright Israel Flash

Un miracle de ‘Hanoucca qui prouve ‘Hanoucca !

A l’angle nord-ouest du mont du Temple a été trouvé un artefact d’étain minuscule, de la taille d’un bouton, où sont inscrits les mots araméens: « Daka Le’Ya», ce qui d’après les directeurs de fouilles au nom de l’AAI (Autorité archéologique Israélienne), les archéologues Eli Shukron et le professeur Ronny Reich de l’Université de Haïfa, signifie «pur pour Dieu. »
Les chercheurs date l’artefact, du premier siècle, vers la fin de la période du Second Temple, sceau similaire à ceux décrits dans la Michna. Ce serait la première fois que des preuves physiques du rituel du temple sont trouvées pour corroborer le compte rendu écrit.
L’équipe croit que ce joint était placé sur de minuscules objets désignés pour être utilisés dans le temple, qui devaient être rituellement purs.

L’archéologue du district de Jérusalem de l’Autorité des Antiquités d’Israël, a déclaré: «Il est écrit dans le Talmud que la cruche d’huile qui a été découverte dans le temple après la victoire des Maccabées sur les Grecs », était couchée avec le sceau du Grand Prêtre » – le sceau indique que l’huile est pure et peut être utilisée pour le service du Temple. Rappelez-vous, cette cruche d’huile a été la base du miracle de Hanoukka qui a réussi à alimenter pendant huit jours la Ménorah ».
En plus de cet artefact, la fouille a également mise à jour d’autres artefacts du Second Temple, certains datant de l’époque de la dynastie hasmonéenne, y compris des lampes à huile, des pots en terre cuite, et des récipients remplis d’ huiles et deparfums, ainsi que des pièces portant l’éfigie des rois Asmonéens tels que Alexandre Jannée et Jean Hyrcan.

Adapté de l’Hébreu par Aschkel pour israel-flash.com - haaretz.co.il
Copyright © Israël Flash

‘Le passeport turc’, ou comment des diplomates turcs ont sauvé des Juifs

ANKARA (AFP)---Pendant la Seconde guerre mondiale, des diplomates turcs ont sauvé des centaines de Juifs en leur donnant des passeports avec lesquels ils se sont réfugiés en Turquie. Cet épisode peu connu est retracé dans le film "Le passeport turc", qui vient d'être projeté notamment à Istanbul.


"Un secret vieux de 66 ans finalement révélé", annoncent les promoteurs de ce documentaire qui sera en compétition lors du Festival européen du film indépendant (ECU), à Paris en mars, et qui retrace l'action de ces 19 diplomates turcs et les témoignages de certains des survivants de l'Holocauste.
"On ne sait pas grand chose sur ce que les Turcs ont fait pendant cette période de l'histoire. Nous voulions le montrer, pour la première fois, et rendre hommage à ces diplomates", explique à l'AFP un des producteurs, Gunes Celikcan.

Le documentaire raconte comment des diplomates turcs en poste dans différents pays d'Europe ont sauvé des Juifs, dont certains n'étaient pas d'origine turque, en leur donnant des passeports pour qu'ils puissent prendre le train pour Istanbul. Au total douze trains, durant plusieurs années. Pendant la Deuxième guerre mondiale, la Turquie était restée neutre (Parmi les diplomates, Behic Erkin, ambassadeur à Paris de 1940 à 1943, Saffet Arikan, ambassadeur à Vichy (1942-44), et Kudret Erbey, consul général à Hambourg (1940-45)).

‘N’oubliez jamais’

"Ces diplomates ont fait ce qu'ils ont pu pour sauver des Juifs de la barbarie dont ils étaient victimes pendant la guerre", estime Naim Guleryuz, de la Quincentennial Foundation, dont le but est d'informer sur l'histoire etla culture des Juifs de Turquie.
"Ces faits sont connus des historiens, mais nous voulions les porter à la connaissance du public avec ce documentaire", ajoute M. Guleryuz, lui-même historien et consultant pour ce projet.
Environ 2.000 Juifs ont ainsi été sauvés, selon M. Celikcan, mais le chiffre exact n'est pas connu, certaines sources faisant état de centaines de personnes.
"Les récits des survivants sont tous émouvants. L'un d'eux a fait venir ses deux filles sur son lit de mort, après la guerre, pour leur dire: N'oubliez jamais que ce sont les Turcs qui nous ont sauvés. Puis il a rendu l'âme en faisant un salut militaire", explique le producteur.
Selon lui, de nombreuses familles qui ont eu la vie sauve en se réfugiant à Istanbul sont rentrées en France après la guerre.

Le site internet du film rapporte le témoignage d'Arlette Bules, qui raconte l'expérience vécue par son père.
"Mon père a été arrêté par les Allemands et envoyé au camp de Drancy. Ma mère a immédiatement été à l'ambassade de Turquie et a demandé de l'aide pour mon père. Grâce aux lettres écrites par l'ambassadeur, mon père a été sauvé du camp."
Le documentaire est basé sur des recherches effectuées en France, aux Etat-Unis, en Turquie, en Israël et en Allemagne, selon le producteur.
Il s'agit d'une initiative privée, a indiqué à l'AFP le ministère turc des affaires étrangères, même si les réalisateurs ont eu accès aux archives officielles.

Selon Gunes Celikcan, la communauté juive de Turquie a également apporté son aide.
Le film, qui est réalisé par Burak Arliel, a été diffusé en marge du festival de Cannes, en mai. Il a été projeté en Allemagne, dans plusieurs villes turques, et il a le soutien du "Projet Aladin", une association qui s'efforce de faciliter le dialogue entre juifs et musulmans.

"Le passeport turc" poursuit une carrière discrète, en pleine crise entre la Turquie et Israël, qui refuse de s'excuser pour un raid meurtrier, en 2010, au cours duquel neuf ressortissants turcs avaient été tués dans un bateau se rendant à Gaza. Ankara a renvoyé l'ambassadeur d'Israël et gelé tous les
accords de défense entre les deux pays.
Mais, fait remarquer le producteur, "ce film est un travail qui dure depuis six ans. Il n'a donc rien à voir avec les changements politiques entre les deux pays".

Serbian President joins lighting of Hanukkah candles in Belgrade

Courtesy of ejpress.org

Serbian President Boris Tadic joined the ceremonial lighting of the Hanukkah candles at the Sukkat Shalom Synagogue in Belgrade Thursday night.
The president used the opportunity to spread a message that the Jewish festival of light reminds us of the importance to show respect and tolerance towards people of all backgrounds.

The ceremony was organized by the local Jewish community in cooperation with the Rabbinical Centre of Europe (RCE), and was attended by Israel’s Chief Rabbi, Yona Metzger, local rabbis, Yoshua Kamenetzky and Isak Asiel, and several hundreds of members of the Jewish community.


"We often speak of the necessity to protect human identity. These occasions are an opportunity to speak about the protection of not only Jewish, but the individual identity of all in Serbia," Tadic said.
The President spoke about the country's diverse multi-layered society that strives to respect and protect human rights.
Tadic also stressed that during the 20th century both Serbians and Jews were subject to great suffering, and that people should always stand by those who are persecuted and suffer discrimination.
The President also promised that Staro Sajmiste, the site of a former concentration camp located on the bank of the River Sava, will be turned into a memorial site that will preserve the memory of all who perished.
The memorial will host a "library of silence" and other institutions which will show the tragic history of the Jews, Serbians and Roma who were killed during WWII.

In his address, Chief Rabbi Metzger thanked those Serbs who saved members of the Jewish community during the Holocaust.
"We must be faithful to those that love us," he said.

Rabbi Arye Goldberg, deputy director of the Rabbinical Centre of Europe, praised the importance of the renaissance of Jewish life in the Balkans.
"There is a reawakening of an interest in Judaism and Jewish traditions amongst the Jews of the Balkans," he said.

Parshas Vayigash 5772

Shem Meshmuel, Copyright & copy 2011 by Rabbi Meir Tamari and Torah.org.
[Dr. Tamari is a renowned economist, Jewish scholar, and founder of the Center For Business Ethics (besr.org) in Jerusalem.]

The following midrash illustrates how the religious tasks and spiritual qualities of Yehudah and Yosef are the key to understanding the clash between the brothers which is the crux of this sedrah and the one that preceded it. "There was a deep well with clear and sweet water, yet because of its depth nobody could benefit from this water, till a person came along and tied a bucket to a rope, thereby drawing up its water". The deep well is Yosef and the wise one who was able to draw the water from its depth is Yehudah. Yehudah, in his repetition of all that had been said and done by Yosef since the brothers had come to Egypt, finally broke down the secrecy and the veils behind which Yosef had hidden himself till we read, "and Yosef could no longer restrain himself. and made himself known to his brothers "(Bereishit, 45:1).

After Yosef had secretly sanctified the Name Of Heaven, he was rewarded with the addition of one letter of the name of Hashem to his name [יהוסף] Psalms, 81). Yehudah who sanctified the Name of Heaven in public, had all the letters of the Holy Name in his name (Sotah, 10b). Yosef had the name changed to include three of the letters of the Name after he had done certain acts. Yehudah's name, however, was unchanged and contained all the letters of G-d's Name from the day of his birth.

From this we may learn that the midrash refers the whole method and nature of their divine worship and holy service.

The whole avodah of Yosef was sanctification in secret. Rashi tells us that he busied himself with his curls and the Zohar adds that he bothered with his clothes that they should be elegant and orderly; all this in order to hide his righteousness and spirituality. This is the pattern of all the descendants of Rachel. When they went to find Saul he was hiding amongst the baggage, while the story of both Esther and Mordechai was hidden beneath clothes, banquets and coded messages as befits hidden miracles. This is why the midrash sees Yoseph as the power that can oppose Eisav, since it is the way of all evildoers to hide their intentions and to cover up their real selves. Eisav, whose evil is disguised, is like the pig, that has only one sign of kosher food, the cloven hoof, but lacks the other one, chewing the cud. So it sleeps deceptively with its foot outstretched but with its mouth closed. Eisav kept his hatred for Yaakov and the intention to kill him in his heart, whil e Haman did the same with regard to Mordechai.

In contrast, the nature and merit of the work of Yehudah is that sanctification is public and visible and is therefore able to affect even external and practical actions. " Your brothers will acknowledge you- therefore he merited sanctifying HaShem in public" (Rashi, Bereisheit, 49, 8). So he acknowledged in public that Tamar was justified. His descendant Nachshon was the first to plunge into the waters of the Red Sea in full view of all of Israel. David is able to confess publicly his sin and dance before the Aron HaKodesh.

Each of these two ways of worship has a special greatness and merit of their own. That of Yosef, conducted in secret and hidden from the sight of others, has a special power and strength. We see that the Maharal (Or Chadash) teaches that which is hidden has extraordinary power in the Heavens above that are themselves hidden. With the power of his avodah that is secret and hidden, Yosef is able bring an abundance of spirituality and sanctity from Heaven done to earth. In contrast, Yehudah, whose avodah is in public and completely revealed through actions, brings the World, even in its lowest spiritual form and even when it is completely material, up to the Heavens. The merit of Yehudah brings the world to the Kingship of Heaven as he is the chariot of the King of Kings. This leads to a desire and a yearning down below on earth for the spirituality, truth and splendor expressed through songs of praise and prayer, as we see in David. Simcha Bunem explained the use of shirei zimrah in Yishtabach, that are 2 words that describe the same thing, as describing the extra yearning that comes after the first level of prayer is reached.

The midrash commenting on the verse, "and the ploughman shall overtake the harvester " (Amos, 9: 13), relates the ploughman to Yehudah and the harvester to Yosef. In his dream Yosef describes he and his brothers binding sheaves, while the verse tells of Yehudah plowing the field of Efraim. The Avnei Nezer explains that the Talmudical comment (Moed Katan (2b) that the physical purpose of plowing is to heal the soil, corresponds in the spiritual world to cure and soften the heart. So this is the role of Yehudah to break open the hearts through practical actions and mitzvot so that the seeds of spiritual growth and religiosity can enter, even as material seeds fall in the furrows and take root there. Yehudah, the king, is the heart of Israel and through his service the verse, "and I will remove the heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh" (Ezekiel, 36: 26) may be accomplished.

In the same way we should understand that there is a spiritual parallel to the physical work of the reaper. The Eglei Tal regarding work on Shabbat explains, that anything that is attached to the ground is considered as ground, so that one who reaps destroys this attachment.

One who is devoted to the bodily and the material is considered to be like them, while one who is able to separate his intelligence and mind from material things and devote them to the spiritual and heavenly things does the work of the harvester. This is Yosef, who is the mind and wisdom of Israel.

The theme of the hidden tzaddik is a common one and is not limited to Chassidic thought. However, in view of the central role played there by the Tzaddik, it is obvious that the nature of his Avodah assumed special importance, indeed being central to the specific type of Chassidut that he developed. In the Pshyscha school there does not seem to be such a tradition of the hidden tzaddik . Perhaps this is because they saw the main purpose of the Tzaddik to provide spiritual guidance and Torah learning, widely defined, rather than the material, economic and social assistance that characterizes almost all of popular and mass orientated chassidut. This orientation of the Tzaddick was something that they shared with the founder of Chabad Chassidism.

Une des dernières photographies des combattants du ghetto de Warshé, 1943


NR : Contrairement aux idées reçues, on voit clairement des hommes religieux, le cheveu court et la barbe longue, dont on aura préalablement ôter la kippa à des fins de propagande allemande.

Shabbat Chanukah 5772

Shem Meshmuel, Copyright & copy 2011 by Rabbi Meir Tamari and Torah.org.
[Dr. Tamari is a renowned economist, Jewish scholar, and founder of the Center For Business Ethics (besr.org) in Jerusalem.]


Neirot Chanukah precede the lights of Shabbat and it is the custom that havdalah precedes the lights of Chanukah. These two lights carry with them two different messages that determine this order.

The language of the Al Hanisim “ You championed their cause [or], You stood up for their grievances; ravta et rivam”, is difficult to understand. After all, that is not speaking of victory nor of judgment of evil ones. Rather, it is like “ if there should be a controversy between two men”(Devarim, 25:1), in which there are claims and counter claims, so that the outcome is in doubt. This was exactly the situation on Chanukah when the Greeks succeeded in breaking the spirit of the Jews, until they had no strength to oppose their oppressors. They were quite incapable of doing anything except to die on Kiddush Hashem. Then Hashem raised up their spirit and their hearts were elevated and proud in His Name, so that they could envisage themselves as being capable of challenging the oppression. Then they were able to regard themselves as worthy opponents in the controversy with the Greeks so that after ravta et rivam came danta et dinam. This is similar to the explanation of the Chiddushei Harim of Gur to the verse in Shmot, 6:6. “ I will take you out from under the ‘sivlot’ [burdens but literally ‘to tolerate’] of the Egyptians ” means that Hashem led Israel to gain strength so that they no longer tolerated the oppression.

This has always been the message of Chanukah, that then a person should arose himself to regard himself as a worthy opponent of the yetzer harah and not despair or regard himself as somebody burdened with an impossible task. He should examine his deeds carefully, as it is written, “I will search Jerusalem with candles” ( Zephaniah, 1:12) in order to discover his wrong deeds, even the smallest of them.; in the Pesikta this is regarded as referring to the candles of Chanukah.

Shabbat, however, is different and its candles are because of shalom beito (Shabbat, 23b). All the six days of the week the body pressures us towards material things and concerns, while the nefesh urges us in the direction of the spiritual and the heavenly. There is no peace between body and soul rather there is a conflict and one or other of them rules. On Shabbat, however, the body surrenders to the nefesh so there is shalom between them and that is shalom beito, of his home, for a man is the home of the nefesh while the body is his flesh ( Avnei Nezer). Furthermore, the sins of a person disturb his peace, as it is written, “ Neither is there any peace in my bones because of my sins” (Tehilim, 38:3). A person’s very bones are in conflict with one another. Yet on Shabbat all one’s work should be completed; the Chidushei Harim taught that this applies even to heavenly things. So that one is completely given over to Hashem, without considering ones shortcomings.

So the neirot Shabbat are the converse of the neirot Chanakah, since the latter call for one to struggle with himself until even the smallest sins are forgotten, whereas those of Shabbat are shalom beito that brings requite from even the major ones and all a persons work is completed. On Motzaei Shabbat before havdalah, there is no need for the neirot Chanukah.

“One who observes Shabbat according to all its regulations, even if he worships idols like the generation of Enosh, his sins are forgiven. It is written, ‘Blessed be Enosh that does this……that keeps the Shabbat machallo, read not machallo but rather machul lo’” (Shabbat, 118b).Even one who does not observe it strictly, since the whole of Israel collectively keeps it then even then ones sins are weakened thereby so that Shabbat brings peace to his bones.

Now the Greeks obscured the light for Israel but when the Bet Hashmonaim defeated them, this changed so that their eyes were lit up with light and His kedusha became a flame. Something of this ability to light up the world beyond the kedusha remained with Israel forever. As a symbol of this we light the Chanukah lights at the entrance to our homes in the public thoroughfare.

Now the neirot Chanukah and the lights of Shabbat, parallel the 2 Messichim, Ben Yosef and Ben David. First will come Mashiach ben Yosef and he will purify the world, remove evil forces and complete the war against Amalek. Then will come Eliyahu Hanavi to bring peace to the world and he will reconcile the hearts of the fathers and the sons. After that will come Ben David to bring the Revelation of G-d’s holiness throughout the world. Neirot Chanukah are Messiach ben Yosef and Eliyahu Hanavi, they correspond to the eve of Shabbat when the angels bless with shalom. Neirot Shabbat are Meshiach ben David and they correspond to Shabbat day, “and the Heavens recount the glory of the Almighty and the sky proclaims His handiwork”; as the Avnei Nezer taught, “the light of the day of Shabbat is the candle of Shabbat day.”

A tous une joyeuse et profonde fête de Chanukka !

Par Shmuel Lemarteleur

b"h
Que, tous, nous puissions passer une joyeuse et profonde fête de Chanukka.
Il est enseigné dans les carnets du septième Rabbi de Loubavitch en particulier, et tous les cours chasidiques en général, que la Grèce se dit "Yavan", qui signifie "la boue".
Qu'est-ce que la Grèce ? Qu'est-ce que la boue ?
La Grèce brille par sa philosophie née de la logique de l'homme pour justifier ses pulsions et désirs.
Que dit la Grèce aux Juifs ? Ne vous attachez pas à ce que vous ne voyez pas, à ce qui n'existe pas, à ce qui n'a pas de fondement logique.
Pourquoi faîtes-vous la circoncision à huit jours et à quoi cela sert-il ? Il n'y a rien de logique à cela, il n'y a rien d'utile pour vous.
Pourquoi sanctifiez-vous le septième jour du shabbat ? Pourquoi vous coupez-vous ainsi du monde ?
Pourquoi prêter autant d'attention au calendrier et à la sanctification de la nouvelle lune ? "Pousse-toi de mon soleil." A dit le cynique Diogène au grand Alexandre. Priez et louez plutôt le soleil !
Pourquoi êtes-vous si scrupuleux quant à votre nourriture ?
La circoncision, shabbat, la nouvelle lune et la cashrout ne reposent sur aucune logique. Ecartez-vous en !
La boue est ce mélange de terre et de boue qui reste collé à nos chaussures. La boue est cette matérialité dans laquelle nous évoluons pour la plupart d'entre nous et qui nous subjugue au point de nous faire presque oublier jusqu'à notre nom, notre langue et nos coutumes.
A force de préférer la boue au chemin propre, à force d'y piétiner, on s'enlise et l'on s'y noie.
Oui chaque Juif est au-dessus de ce qui apparait comme naturel, parce qu'il y a en lui une étincelle de divinité qu'il n'y a nulle part ailleurs.
Oui chaque Juif est un fils pour son Père.
Oui chaque Juif est un serviteur pour son Maître.
Qui est le Père et le Maître de chaque Juif ? Le Créateur des sphères célestes et de la terre, le créateur du temps et de l'espace, des hommes, des arbres, des pierres et des animaux, D.ieu Seul et Un.
Chaque Juif sait cela et qu'il le reconnaisse ou non dépend de son libre arbitre.
Il est enseigné qu'aucun Juif, sauf celui qui s'est fait dieu, ne sera écarté du Monde à Venir et du Gan Eden.
Cela signifie que chaque Juif à un moment de son existence proclame solennellement qu'il n'y a rien d'autre que D.ieu.
La fête de Chanukka est ce moment.

Exclusivité (2) : Préparez-vous à des émeutes lors de l’effondrement de l’euro, les diplomates ont reçu l’instruction de se préparer au pire !

L’talie et l’Espagne sont au bord de la faillite et des ministres britanniques croient que l’effondrement de l’euro est de plus en plus plausible.
Les diplomates se préparent à aider les Britanniques à l’étranger dans l’éventualité d’un effondrement bancaire et d’émeutes liées à la crise de la dette. Le gouvernement, le Trésor, a d’ailleurs confirmé plus tôt ce mois-ci que la planification d’urgence pour un effondrement est actuellement en cours.
Un ministre important a révélé l’ampleur de la préoccupation du gouvernement affirmant que la Grande-Bretagne est en train de planifier la chute de la zone euro et que ce n’est qu’une question de temps!
Le British Foreign & Commonwealth Office a donné des instructions récentes aux ambassades et aux consulats concernant la planification d’urgence, leur demandant de se préparer à des scénarios extrêmes, à des émeutes et à des graves troubles sociaux.
Les diplomates doivent se préparer à aider des dizaines de milliers de citoyens britanniques dans les pays en zone euro, à envisager les conséquences lorsque les gens ne pourront plus accéder à leurs comptes bancaires, à leur argent.
Les traités de l’Union Européenne, qui ont défini les règles d’adhésion, ne contiennent aucune disposition pour que les membres puissent en sortir. Si les gouvernements de la zone euro n’arrivent plus à acquitter leurs dettes, les banques européennes qui détiennent leurs obligations risquent l’effondrement.
Certains analystes croient que ce genre d’évènement pourrait provoquer l’effondrement global du système, laissant les banques incapables de redonner l’argent aux épargnants et par le fait même, mettre des milliers d’entreprises dépendantes du crédit bancaire à la rue.
Certains économistes estiment que dans le pire des cas, l’effondrement de l’euro produira la réduction du PIB de ses États-membres jusqu’à créer le chômage de plus de la moitié de la population. [Les pays n'auront même plus d'argent pour mettre les gens en chômage...]
Lire la suite

Sources : The Télégraph et wikistrike

Manifestations contre le projet de loi sur le muezzin

Par Naama Rehoboam

Des centaines d'Arabes-israéliens sont descendus dans la rue samedi 17 novembre pour protester contre un projet de loi qu’ils jugent contraire à la liberté de religion de l’Etat démocratique.
La semaine dernière, le Comité ministériel législatif s’est mis à discuter d’une proposition visant à réduire le son des haut-parleurs des mosquées. Des haut-parleurs utilisés pour les prières, mais qui sont de plus en plus utilisés également pour les prêches.
« La loi sur les mosquées est une question très sensible, a-t-il poursuivi. Ils veulent nous humilier à tout prix. Aujourd’hui nous envoyons un message à l'État pour qu’il comprenne que nous ne permettrons pas une seconde Nakba ».

Le membre de la Knesset, Jamal Zahalka (Balad), s’est exprimé ouvertement sur la question : « L'incendie de la mosquée et le projet de loi sur les mosquées font partie d'une guerre déclarée contre la population arabe et musulmane par des colons racistes. Le son du muezzin, les cloches de l'église et le son du shofar ont toujours existé», a-t-il insisté….
La proposition, initiée à la Knesset par Anastassia Michaeli (Yisrael Beiteinu), vise plus exactement à interdire aux mosquées de sonner l'appel du muezzin tôt le matin et pendant la nuit afin d'éviter de déranger les riverains.
« Le projet de loi fonde son hypothèse sur les plaintes déposées par des centaines de milliers d'Israéliens qui souffrent du bruit causé par les appels quotidiens du muezzin, en particulier dans la matinée », a expliqué A. Michaeli.

Rappelons que les Israéliens sont plus « tolérants » que les Suisses : il y a des minarets en Israël (l’appel du muezzin se fait du haut des minarets).

Exclusivité (1) : On pourra écrire ce que l'on pense de Martine AUBRY et Jean-Louis BROCHEN en tant que personnes publiques

Par Joëlle de Paris

Extraits du JUGEMENT rendu le 17 octobre 2011 par la 17ème chambre presse-civile du Tribunal de Grande Instance de PARIS (N° RG : 11/12059)
Vu l’assignation à jour fixe du 26 juillet 2011 et les conclusions du 9 septembre 2011,
aux termes desquelles Martine AUBRY et Jean-Louis BROCHEN demandent au tribunal de dire que la diffusion sur le blog accessible à l’adresse http://semanticien.blogspirit.com d’un texte dans lequel figurent certains propos (qui seront repris dans la suite du présent jugement) constitue au préjudice de Martine AUBRY, d’une part, et de Jean-Louis BROCHEN, d’autre part, le délit de diffamation publique envers un particulier.

Mentions reprochées au blogueur par Martine AUBRY : « Et puisque les administrateurs de sites ont le trouillometre à zéro, je vous récapitule ce qui ne relève d’aucune rumeur et qui est la stricte vérité connue de tous : Martine a effectué trois cures de désintoxication alcoolique par sevrage dans un établissement psychiatrique spécialisé dans le traitement des addictions (Maison de santé de Merfy dans la Marne ?). »
Décision du tribunal : « En effet, l’alcoolisme se définit comme un abus de boissons alcooliques, déterminant un ensemble de troubles. Cet état est considéré comme une maladie et est évoqué comme tel dans l’article, qui précise notamment les traitements médicaux qui auraient été suivis, sans aucunement décrire des attitudes ou comportements publics contraires à l’honneur ou à la considération.
Les propos, qui sont ainsi relatifs à un état pathologique, ne sont pas diffamatoires et leur diffusion serait, le cas échéant, susceptible d’être attentatoire à la vie privée. »

Décision du tribunal concernant son mari Jean-Louis BROCHEN : "Les passages incriminés imputent au demandeur d’avoir “fait sa réputation en défendant des islamistes”, d’avoir une “réputation médiatique de défenseur des provocateurs salafistes et communautaristes” et de s’être “taill[é] une belle réputation” en choisissant “de défendre des provocateurs salafistes et un convertis au djihad devenu terroriste”. Il est ainsi allégué qu’il a choisi de défendre ces personnes qui lui ont fait “une belle réputation” ; même si l’avocat a fait ces choix “en connaissance de causes” et “de façon récurrente”, il n’est ni affirmé ni même insinué qu’il adhérerait aux idées et doctrines de ses clients.
Même s’ils sont formulés de manière désagréable envers Jean-Louis BROCHEN, les propos ne sont pas diffamatoires à son encontre, mais sont l’expression d’un jugement de valeur, certes critique, à son égard."

L’absence totale de diffusion de ce jugement, qui, je le précise, est peut-être frappé d’appel, montre que les bloggeurs et les médias ont encore « le trouillometre à zéro ».

The Shem MiShmuel, The Admor Rabbi Shmuel of Holy Blessed Memory

The Shem MiShmuel, 4 Chesvhan 5617 (1856) – 24 Tevet 5686 (1926)

Notes about his personality

Rabbi Shmuel of holy blessed memory was born in the year 5617 in the house of his holy grandfather Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Kotzk (his righteous mother was Sara Tzina the daughter of the fiery Admor of Kotzk) during the time that his father the Gaon Rabbi Avrahamele was supported at the table of his father-in-law. His youth was spent in Parczow and Krosniewice, places that Rabbi Avrahamele served as rabbi and spread Torah publicly. During those days the young Reb Shmuel soaked up most of his Torah from his father – for the rabbinate did not take much of his time, as he was coronated as a Rebbe only in 5630, -- and even at that time the lines of Hassidim that knocked on his door were not too long, and did not disturb him from his learning. Therefore, he was able to give of his time freely to the education and teaching of his only son who was fitting, and to give him to taste of his treasures.

In 5634 (1874) he married Yuta Lea the daughter of the well-known Kotzker Hassid Rabbi Eliezer Lipman, the son-in-law of the holy Rabbi Shlomo of Radomsk, the author of “Tiferet Shlomo” (this did not prevent Rabbi Eliezer Lipman from being an enthusiastic Hassid of Kotzk). Even after his marriage he did not leave his father’s house, as was customary in those days, to be supported at the house of his father-in-law. He rather remained to live near his father in Krosniewice, for it was difficult for the two of them to part. The couple moved together with Rabbi Avrhamale of holy blessed memory to Nasielsk and later to Sochaczerw. There they lived in a separate dwelling on Warsaw Street, and they made their livelihood from a wine store. In truth, he did not ever spend much time with his business, for a trusted associate ran it.

After his first wife died after a reasonably long life, he married (in 5663 – 1903) Mirel the daughter of the Gaon Rabbi Moshe Natan Shapira, the head of the rabbinical court of Kaszionz (the author of “Shemen Lemaor”).

After the passing of his father the Gaon Rabbi Avraham of holy blessed memory in 5670 (1910), the Hassidim coronated him to take his father’s place as the Admor of Sochaczew, and he then moved to live in the home of his father in the Hassidic courtyard.

At the outbreak of the First World War, (Av 5674), he was with a healer in Germany. He was arrested there as a Russian citizen, and only after great efforts did he succeed – along with other Admorim who were in the same position – to return to Poland. However due to the persecutions of the Jews by the Czarist government and the scheming of the officials, it was dangerous for him to return to Sochaczew, a small town, and therefore he decided to remain for a period of time in Lodz. He lived there during the days of the war, and was not in Sochaczew at the time of its destruction in 5675 (1915).

In Lodz, in the midst of a large community of his Hassidim and friends, he spent the difficult days of the war, he suffered with all of their sufferings, and was available to encourage and assist them, and to guide them with advice and counsel during the days of confusion. It is interesting that during those days he excelled in his energetic activity to raise up the stature of Torah and Hassidism, as is testified to by his humorous essays – printed in the book Shem Mishmuel – which he produced for his community of faithful, and which occupy most of that book. Not only did Hassidim of Sochaczew come early in the morning to his door, but most of those that turned to him were Hassidim of other dynasties, as well as many non-Hassidim.

However, the life in the big city with its large population was difficult for him, and the many who turned to him distracted him from his holy work, and his state of health also suffered due to this. The many tribulations weighted down to him as a heavy burden, and therefore he left in 5679 (1919) to live in Zagorze, a small town near Lodz, in order to distance himself somewhat from the tumult and crowds of this active city. He settled there and established his Yeshiva there only temporarily, and he never ceased to make plans to return to the destroyed Sochaczew.

In 5686 (1926) his illness became more severe. On the advice of his physicians, he moved to Otwock, a resort near Warsaw, however not long thereafter he passed away at the age of 70, on the 24 of Tevet 5686. He was brought to eternal rest near the grave of his father in Sochaczew, and the entire house of Israel mourned the loss bitterly.

He was the only son of his parents (aside from him they had a daughter by the name of Esther, who was married to Rabbi Meir Borenstein, the brother of her father. They lived in Sochaczew and she died there during her father’s lifetime). from his youth he never moved from the side of his father. He was always with him, and he saw himself as his student in every way, and he revered him without bound. Even as time went on, and he himself was the father of a large family, not one day passed when they did not see each other. Even afterward, when he filled the place of his father, when he himself was already an Admor, he did not see himself as standing upon his own authority, setting out his own path. It was always to him as if he was resting upon the shoulders of his father the Gaon, as if he was only an interpreter of his father’s words.

This was not because he was weak minded and always required support to stand up. On the contrary, Reb Shmuel of holy blessed memory was strong in his opinions and did not give in to anybody. He stood his own very firmly with a clear and sharp wit. However it was different with respect to his father, since he would always give into him, and he was always an attentive son and student.

On the other hand, the relationship of his father to him was also extraordinary. The famous Gaon of his generation, the halachic decisor whom nobody could dispute, related to his son with respect and reverence. He valued greatly his opinions in Torah, both in the revealed and hidden Torah, and he looked upon him as a person of worth. He would refer to him (not in his presence), my Reb Shmuel (“Mein Reb Shmuel”). Most of those who would turn to him with respect to matters of spirituality or matters of the world he would send to Reb Shmuel, by saying: “Have you already been to my Reb Shmuel?”. He was always interested to hear his opinion on important matters. This powerful man did not do a small or large matter without soliciting the advice of his son.

Here is an interesting tidbit. The author of “Avnei Nezer”[1]did not have the custom (in particular during the latter years) to have a communal third Sabbath meal. Therefore the Hassidim would gather in the house of Reb Shmuel of holy blessed memory, who would arrange the third Sabbath meal, replete with words of Torah as was the custom among Admorim (and this was in the life of his father, and in the same city!). The father would advise the Hassidim who gathered before him at this time to go to the table of Reb Shmuel of holy blessed memory, and he would even show some anger to those who did not do so.

Thus did they live together for 35 years, acting jointly in all areas. It was as if they possessed the same soul – and the legacy of their soul was one, together the breathed the air of the heights of Kotzk On occasions it seemed as if the father, the famous Gaon before whose utterances many trembled, found support from the solid Kotzk shoulders of the son. (It should be pointed out that Reb Shmuel was also impressive and strong in body build, he was tall and had a glorious countenance, he walked upright and his face was glowing and splendorous despite the seriousness of his expression.) For here, perhaps, we can begin to understand the unusual relation between these two, the father and the son. Who, aside from Reb Shmuel, had such intimate contact with the internal world of the ‘Avnei Nezer”, and merited to recognize his internal greatness in Torah and fear of Heaven, – and from that comes the boundless reverence of the son to the father. He was more a prized student than a son – due to his knowledge of him. The respect of the father to the Kotzker son, very strong and powerful, comes from the reverence which is beyond description, and the cloak of his fiery father-in-law from Kotzk, who from a young age merited to enter into the inner sanctum of his courtyard, and subordinated himself to him completely, to the exclusion of any personal desire and youthful whims, and did not free himself from this subordination all the way through his old age.




This strong line – the way of Kotzk – accompanied him through all of his days of activity, and influenced all of his deeds and words. He expressed himself through his books – the eight volumes of “Shem Mishmuel” which appeared posthumously – in which he published words of Torah and Hassidism organized according to the weekly Torah portion, words which he spoke before his congregation of Hassidim during the years 5670-5686 (1910-1926). These words are written clearly with rich expression, with a warm breath – as if these words are only now coming out of his holy mouth.

The main point of his words, the recurring theme, serve as a means to peek into the inner depths of his personality and to recognize the great yearning which he yearned, and for which he worked without tiring. He constantly stove for completeness of the soul and for a complete unity in worship of G-d. This unification of personality was the main point of his words. The desire of the heart for the Creator of all, with constant enthusiasm, and without ever letting it out of his mind, and his task to direct the waves of yearning for the object of his yearning – the unification of the soul with G-d and his Torah, – this was the purpose of this elite man, it was about this that he preached, and it was this that he demanded of others as well as himself, first and foremost of himself. With regard to the life of activity – in his words: “ the six days of effort – one will only see the scattering of the soul, the scattering of the desire, at a time when most of a person’s effort is centered around one goal; and if a person is able to direct his thoughts and desires to one point, thus he will succeed in understanding the depths of it, – obviously, I am referring to coming close to G-d, – this is signified by the Sabbath, when all work is forbidden, and the soul is free to direct itself specifically to this holy purpose. The Sabbath is a taste of the World to Come, the barriers fall down on it, and particularly those whose root is in the physical nature of man, and he is able to come close to his Creator.” These words and others give us a key to understanding his mighty personality, and the also mark his outward behavior. This is the Hassidism of Pshischa and Kotzk in the style of Sochaczew.

He was also involved in the communal life of Polish Jewry. He took a clear stand, without fear, with respect to all of the problems that afflicted that era, including also mockery[2]. He expressed his opinions in a clear fashion, without wavering. His words were not always acceptable to his opponents, however they were forced to respect the earnestness, uprightness, and lack of personal interest in his words.

All his days, he desired to settle in the Land of Israel. In 5651 (1891), he visited the Land of Israel with the encouragement of his father, the author of “Avnei Nezer”, in order to acquire land and found a Hassidic settlement. However, the prohibition of selling land in the Land of Israel to citizens of Russia interfered with their plans. On this occasion, he traversed the length and breadth of the Land of Israel, and he always spoke about this wonderful experience of his. During the time of the awakening surrounding the Balfour Declaration, he took the view that it was required to settle in the Land of Israel – and to establish agricultural settlements of Hassidim, and he spoke about that topic in his capacity of participant in all of the leadership councils of Agudas Yisrael. He urged Agudas Yisrael to include effort for the Land of Israel on its agenda. Even in his latter years when it was impossible for him to acquire land in the Land of Israel for many reasons, he never ceased to desire and to speak about his desire to settle in the Land of Israel.

With the passing of his father the Gaon Rabbi Avraham of blessed memory (5670 – 1910), the Hassidim of Sochaczew coronated him as their Admor. All the elder Hassidim including famous Gaonim, such as the Gaon Rabbi Yoav Yehoshua the head of the rabbinical court of Kinczek (the author of the book “Chelkat Yoav”), the Gaon Rabbi Yitzchak Feigenbaum the head of the rabbinical court of Warsaw, and many other elite spiritual men, Hassidim and men of worthy deeds, gathered around him and accepted his authority. He continued in the path of his father of holy blessed memory – a blend of Torah and Hassidism, resting in the depths of halacha with enthusiasm and spirit, however he added his own breath, and wove a fundamental thread in the tapestry of Kotzk-Sochaczew Hassidism. His rich and powerfully expressive manner of speech established Sochaczew Hassidism and added an important layer upon the glorious edifice that was Polish Hassidism. His books were accepted in wide circles, and became fundamental texts of Polish Hassidism.

He also had an important role in the spreading of Torah. He renewed the Yeshiva of Sochaczew and appointed the young sage Rabbi Aryeh Tzvi Frumer, may G-d avenge his soul (who later became the head of the Yeshiva Chachmei Lublin) to head it. This Yeshiva existed until the outbreak of the First World War. Many of the rabbis and sages of Poland came from that Yeshiva. He also founded a Yeshiva “Beis Avraham” in Lodz, which existed until the Holocaust.

He expended great effort in organizing and publishing the manuscripts of his father the Gaon of holy blessed memory, and he published the seven-volume responsa set “Avnei Nezer”. He include his own glosses on the content on almost every page, noted discreetly in the name of the publisher, and sometimes only noted by parentheses.

He occupied the seat of the Admor of Sochaczew for sixteen years. Only part of those years were spent in Sochaczew itself, and most of them outside of the city. However, he always saw himself – and others saw him – as tied to Sochaczew and whatever transpired in it. He was laid to rest honorably in Sochaczew.

Parshas Vayeishev 5772

Shem Meshmuel, Copyright & copy 2011 by Rabbi Meir Tamari and Torah.org.
[Dr. Tamari is a renowned economist, Jewish scholar, and founder of the Center For Business Ethics (www.besr.org) in Jerusalem.]


We have to understand the clarify the nature of the city of Shechem and this will help us to discover the whole nature of the quarrel between Yoseph and his brothers.

"Shechem was a place that was destined for suffering. In Shechem Dinah was abused, there the brothers sold Yoseph and it was there that the Davidic Kingdom was divided by Yeravam ben Nevat" (Sanhedrin, 102a).
However, at the same time, Shechem was chosen as Yaakov's gift to Yoseph. It was sanctified as an Ir Miklat that could give sanctuary from the goel hadam and it was one of the 3 places of which the nations can never question our ownership; Har Hamoriah, Hevron and Shechem.
This contradiction can be solved by looking at Bereishit 2, verse 1 " Vayechulu hashmayim ve ha'aretz ve chol zeva'am"- vayechulu, from the word clall. All the 6 days of creation each of the constituent parts of creation was growing and expanding to realize their individual potential and purpose. Each one was an entity by itself, until through the power of the Shabbat they were all became united together into one comprehensive unit; so the creation became complete, as it is written, vanifash, it received its nefesh. The same is true of the human body where each organ develops and moves independently and yet the power of life and the nefesh unites them into one being. So too, the sons of Yaakov were each one growing and extending themselves spiritually, so that they each were considered complete and separate. However, because of their greatness they were unable to unite, as the Arie explained that the minds of people are not the same and therefore it is difficult for them to achieve unity.
The Maharal taught that the lack of unity amongst the Jews is not because of any weakness of theirs, but on the contrary because of the spiritual and intellectual greatness of each individual. [This idea of great spiritual and intellectual people being unable to subjugate themselves to the greatness of another, is an oft repeated one in the School of Psyscha, as may be seen in the comments of the Shem Mi Shmuel on Lag Ba Omer] The brothers should have been united under Yoseph who represents the Shabbat, just as the parts of Creation were. What prevented this was because "He brought to his father their evil report" (Ber.36: 2). So was born hatred between them and therefore Yoseph no longer had the power to unite them. Disunited, discord grew till the separation of their hearts was total, so they hated him. In this way we can easily understand the midrash, that after the sale of Yoseph, the brothers said, "Let us disperse and separate". We know that the greater the identification of the individual with the group or entity, the greater will be the power of the group to help and support that individual. So when the brothers lost the unifying nature of Yoseph, they naturally would want to separate and each go his own separate way.

When we remember that the word Shechem derives from division or part (Tehillim, 60:8 and 108:8), then we will see that the nature of the very place contributed to all the tragedies that occurred there. The divisive nature of Shechem caused its inhabitants to see themselves as an independent and special creation; that moved Shechen benHamor to rape Dinah. The Avnei Nezer explained that the divisive nature of the place caused him to see himself as a special being and therefore he desired the daughter of Yaakov; his desire was specifically to join with Yaakov. Because of its nature of division, the place lent itself to the division of the brothers, since each one considered himself special and unique so that they could not subjugate themselves to another and become a united clall. The nature of Shechem also encouraged the disunity that resulted in the breakup of the Davidic kingdom, as the tribes seeing their own spiritual greatness and uniqueness, were unable to humble themselves and subjugate themselves to the Davidic dynasty.

" Now his brothers went to pasture their father's flock in Shechem" (Ber.37:12). Rashi noting the dots on the word 'et' comments that they went there to find themselves. [The Admor Menachem Mendel of Kotsk similarly teaches that a person should always know what he is looking for, based on " And he said [to Yoseph], "What are you seeking", verse15]. Troubled by their hatred of Yoseph, the brothers went to Shechem, a place conducive to individual worth and special importance, in order to re-discover their own value. Perhaps that is also why Yaakov sent Yoseph to Shechem.

How was it that Yoseph HaTzaddik sinned with Lashan Hara? He suspected his brothers and should have spoken to them about his suspicions. The ensing discussion would have either shown them to be false or enabled him to reprimand them and cause them to repent. However, Yoseph in the modesty characteristic of all the descendants of Rachel, could not bring himself to bring himself to confront and criticize the brothers who were all older than him. Instead he brought their evil report toYaakov. The Zohar writes that one who has to rebuke others but not do so, has the defect of speech visited on him and affliction follows (Part 3, 46b). Yoseph's 19 years in prison was atonement for the slander of his 10 brothers. Even though his motives were good, nevertheless, considering Yoseph's elevated stature this was considered a sin. Therefore, in order to restore him as Tzaddik yesod olam, the test of Potiphar's wife was necessary.

This is similar to, "Because of the modesty of Rabbi Zechariah ben Avkulos the Second Temple was destroyed and we were exiled from our Land"(Gittin, 56a). So the sale of Yoseph was to the destruction of the 2nd Temple as explained by Sforno.

Le cahier de coloriages pour Chanukkah 5772

Pour télécharger le cahier de coloriages cliquez ICI.

Le QUIZZ de 'HANOUCCAH

1- La fête de 'Hanouccah est aussi appelée :
a- La fête des Lumières
b- Les soldes hivernales
c- Le noël juif (Il n'est écrit nulle part qu'il faille offrir des cadeaux aux enfants à 'Hanouccah.)
d- Le ramadan yiddish

2- Les héros de 'Hanouccah vivaient :
a- En Ouganda (Projet d'implantation du peuple sioniste)
b- En Alaska (Projet d'implantation du peuple sioniste)
c- Dans les territoires occupés
d- Dans les territoires libérés

3- Les Juifs en ce temps-là adoraient D.ieu :

a- Dans le Temple de Jérusalem
b- En vacances
c- A la section locale du parti (appelée aussi une cellule)
e- Pendant les cours de Bar-Mitsva civile (qui commence traditionnellement le premier soir de Roch Hachana.)

4- Soudain, un nouveau leader a pris le pouvoir en Syrie séleucide, il s'agit de :

a- Henry Kissinger
b- Charles de Gaulle
c- Martine Aubry
d- Antiochus

5- Ce leader imposa aux Juifs :

a- De manger du porc
b- D'être un Juif chez soi et comme tout le monde à l'extérieur
c- De voter socialiste aux présidentielles en France en 2012
d- D'accrocher un portrait de Max Nordau dans son salon

6- Le nom de celui qui initia la révolte contre les Grecs est :
a- Mattityahou
b- Bernard
c- Vladimir
d- Charles

7- Dans quelle ville habitait-il ?

a- Lille
b- Colombey-Les-Deux-Eglises
c- Médine
d- Modin

8- Qui s'allia avec les Juifs contre les Grecs ?
a- L'ONU
b- L'UNESCO
c- Les sionistes français (Voir Albert Londres, Le Juif errant est arrivé, in Le Petit Parisien, 1929)
d- Personne

9- Où les Juifs ont-ils battu les Grecs ?
a- A Austerlitz
b- A Wien
c- A Bâle
d- Aucun de ces lieux n'existait.

10- Dans plusieurs communautés, l'usage est que les femmes doivent s'abstenir de tout travail pendant les trente minutes qui suivent l'allumage de la 'Hanoucciah, ce qui a poussé de nombreuses autorités :
a- A changer de communauté
b- A réécrire cette règle stupide
c- A se marier avec une non-juive
d- La Hala'Ha est la Hala'Ha. Joyeuse fête de 'Hanouccah à tous !

100% Lahayal: Opération gilets polaires pour les soldats




L'Irlande est le pays le plus hostile à Israël en Europe.

© Juif.org

La haine d'Israël atteint des nouveaux sommets en Irlande. Une scandaleuse campagne anti-israélienne a eu lieu le week-end dernier sur la principale rue piétonne de Dublin, représentant les soldats de Tsahal en soldats nazis.
Dans le cadre de cette action, parrainée par le conseil municipal de Dublin, un groupe de militants pro palestiniens a mis en place une maquette de la barrière de séparation et de barrages de Tsahal.
Les militants se sont habillés en soldats et ont battu, humilié et pointé leurs armes vers d'autres activistes déguisés en palestiniens, et ce devant des milliers de citoyens irlandais et de touristes.
Cette action rejoint des accusations lancées contre Israël au parlement irlandais la semaine dernière, disant qu'Israël avait "kidnappé, maltraité et déshabillé" les ressortissant irlandais qui ont participé à une flottille pour Gaza et arrêté récemment par Israël.

Ce n'est pas tout. Un groupe Facebook lancé il y a deux mois appelle au lancement de lourdes pierres sur le bâtiment de l'ambassade d'Israël à Dublin. Des éléments anti-israéliens ont récemment vandalisé un auditorium de Dublin pour empêcher l'accueil d'un concert du chanteur israélien Izhar Ashdot.
Les comptes Facebook des fonctionnaires de l'ambassade israélienne ont été attaqués par des pirates irlandais, et des éléments anti-israéliens tentent de perturber le festival du film israélien organisé par l'ambassade à Dublin la semaine prochaine.

"Le gouvernement irlandais nourris sa population de haine anti-israélienne", a déclaré un responsable israélien. "Ce que nous voyons ici est clairement de l'antisémitisme."
Des sources au sein du ministère des affaires étrangères ont dit que l'Irlande devient sans aucun doute le pays le plus hostile à Israël dans l'Union Européenne," poussant l'ensemble des pays de l'Europe à une approche radicale et intransigeante."
Selon ces sources, lorsque l'ambassadeur israélien Boaz Modai est arrivé à Dublin, un des principaux journaux irlandais a salué son arrivée par un article ayant pour titre "bienvenue en enfer".

"Tu t'aimeras comme tu aimes l'Autre."

b"h

Le sixième rabbi de Loubavitch, Yossef YtsHak Schneersohn, de mémoire bénie, enseigne qu'il n'est suffisant de comprendre et de mettre en pratique : "Tu aimeras ton Prochain comme Toi-même."
Il faut faire plus, et ce plus est : "Tu t'aimeras comme tu aimes l'Autre."

L'association du Cercle d'Etudes Historiques du Marais ne dépend d'aucune institution juive orthodoxe, consistoriale et autre. Ses membres actifs exercent une profession indépendante et extérieure à l'association. Il n'y a aucun frais de fonctionnement chez nous.
Toute l'année nous donnons ce que nous avons.
Nous ne sommes pas bénévoles. Nous vivons pour aimer l'autre.

Qui est cet autre ?
Celui qui n'a pas de quoi manger, s'habiller, étudier.
Celui qui vit dans la solitude.
Celui qui est hospitalisé pour une longue période.
Celui qui est handicapé.
Celui qui est fou.
Celui qui a besoin de voir un visage souriant.
Celui qui a besoin de parler.
Celui qui nous est présenté par un médecin, un ami , un membre de la famille ou une personne de confiance.

L'aide alimentaire se fait par facilités de caisse chez nos partenaires, discrètement, sans qu'il soit nécessaire de s'inscrire et d'aller chercher des bons d'achat quelque part, sans qu'il soit nécessaire d'attendre chez soi toute la journée un carton de nourriture.
Nous avons besoin de vêtements propres et recousus pour hommes, femmes et enfants. Ces vêtements doivent être neutres ou au moins sans connotation particulière.
Nous avons besoin de chaussures neuves et solides pour hommes, femmes et enfants.
Nous avons besoin de livres comme neuf et conformes à la vie juive : des livres saints, des livres de contes pour enfants, des livres éducatifs, des manuels scolaires, des livres pratiques et des disques et partitions musicales.
Nous avons besoin d'argent. Nous délivrons les reçus CERFA pour les particuliers, les entreprises.

Nous insistons sur le fait que vous ne saurez pas à qui vous donnez et que les bénéficiaires ne savent pas de qui ils reçoivent.

Pour nous aider et nous contacter, composer le 06 58 49 81 91.

Pour adresser votre règlement par chèque ou mandat : l'ordre est "CEH du MARAIS". L'adresse d'envoi est : "CEH du MARAIS, chez LEMARTELEUR, appartement 524, 21 rue Archereau, 75019 Paris.

Pour un virement :
Titulaire du compte : CEH DU MARAIS chez LEMARTELEUR Myriam, 21 rue Archereau, 75019 Paris
Agence qui tient le compte : Société Générale Paris Provence Richer 03201
Code Banque : 30003
Numéro de compte : 00050438011
Clé RIB : 96

"Tu t'aimeras comme tu aimes l'Autre."
Myriam LEMARTELEUR
Présidente de l'association du Cercle d'Etudes Historiques du Marais

Présentation du Musée d'histoire des Juifs polonais au Mémorial de la Shoah

Courtoisie de www.tv5.org

Le 22 novembre 2011, Son Excellence Tomasz Orlowski, Ambassadeur de la République de Pologne, a participé à la présentation du Musée d'histoire des Juifs Polonais, organisée au Mémorial de la Shoah à Paris.

En ouvrant cette rencontre, Monsieur l'Ambassadeur a parlé de la grande importance que la Pologne accorde à ce musée en cours de réalisation - musée qui va présenter l'héritage des Juifs faisant partie intégrante de l'histoire polonaise. Il a remarqué qu'un tournant est en train de se faire dans les relations communes entre les Polonais et les Juifs, dont ce musée est un signe visible.

Il a souligné le fait que cette institution voit le jour grâce au partenariat public- privé. Car ce musée est la première institution publique et privée de ce type en Pologne, créée avec l'aide du gouvernement, des autorités locales et des organisations non-gouvernementales.

Mme le professeur Barbara Kischenblatt-Gimblett, anthropologue, directeur du département des expositions du Musée a présenté à la fois l'idée de la création du musée et les expositions permanentes dont elle est la co-réalisatrice. L'initiative de la création du Musée d'histoire des Juifs Polonais est née au sein de la fondation de l'Institut Historique Juif de Varsovie, et elle a progressivement obtenu l'approbation en Pologne et dans le monde. Le musée d'histoire des Juifs polonais a pour objectif est de veiller à l'image, à la fois crédible, vraie et ouverte, de l'histoire des Juifs en Pologne, ainsi que des relations polono-juives pendant 1000 ans.

Le Musée d'Histoire des Juifs Polonais qui sera inauguré en 2013 dans l'enceinte même de l'ancien ghetto de Varsovie, sera le premier et l'unique musée dans le monde consacré entièrement à l'histoire des Juifs polonais. A côté du Musée de l'Holocauste à Washington et du Yad Vashem à Jérusalem, il prendra place comme l'un des plus importants établissements de ce type dans le monde.

L'événement a eu lieu en présence de Mme Corinne Evans, présidente de la Fondation Evans et du Comité Européen de soutien du Musée, Jean-Yves Potel, collaborateur au Mémorial de la Shoah, spécialiste des relations polono-juives, et le débat a été mené par Annette Becker, professeur d'université, membre de l'Institut Universitaire de France.

La présentation du Musée d'Histoire des Juifs polonais a été organisée par l'Institut Polonais dans le cadre des rencontres dédiées à l'histoire et à la mémoire de l'Holocauste en Pologne, avec la participation des spécialistes polonais et français, auteurs des publications consacrées aux relations entre les Polonais et les Juifs dans les années 1939-1945.

De la part de H. S


Claims Conference Negotiates €485 Million ($650 Million) in Pensions for Additional 16,000 Survivors; German Government Criteria Changes Largely Affec

Courtoisie de Claims Conference

The Claims Conference negotiating delegation in recent talks. Below, Budapest Ghetto victims are among those who will receive pensions following negotiations.

More than 16,000 Holocaust survivors who have been denied German compensation pensions will now be eligible to receive them as a result of Claims Conference negotiations with the German government. The agreement will result in at least €485 million (approximately $650 million) in additional Claims Conference payments over the next decade.

Prior to the negotiations, certain survivors were only eligible for pensions from the Claims Conference if they had been in a ghetto, in hiding, or living under false identity for at least 18 months during the Nazi era. This minimum time period of persecution was part of the eligibility criteria established by the German government, and which the Claims Conference for years has been working to change.

As of January 1, 2012, the minimum time period for having lived under any of these conditions will be reduced to 12 months. The Claims Conference estimates that this change will make an additional 8,000 survivors eligible for pensions, who are estimated to receive a total of about €290 ($406) million over the next 10 years.

The Article 2 Fund makes monthly payments of €300 and the CEEF makes monthly payments of €260 to certain Holocaust survivors who meet all eligibility criteria, which encompass factors other than persecution history (Please see: Article 2 Fund Eligibility Criteria and CEEF Eligibility Criteria on the Claims Conference Website).

Further, as of January 1, 2012, those survivors age 75 and over who were in a ghetto for less than 12 months but a minimum of three months will be entitled to a special monthly pension of €240 if they live in the West or €200 if they live in the countries of the former Soviet bloc, if they meet the other eligibility criteria of the programs. This change should result in new payments for about 4,500 survivors in 2012, with a total of approximately €130 million to be paid over the next decade. Further, an additional 3,500 survivors will become eligible as they reach age 75 over the coming years, who the Claims Conference estimates will be paid a total of €65 million over the next decade. This liberalization will drastically change the compensation programs, especially for those who endured the Budapest Ghetto.

Historical photos of the Budapest Ghetto can be viewed at www.claimscon.org/budapestghetto.

These liberalizations will largely affect child survivors, whose special plight has been a primary focus of recent discussions between the Claims Conference and the German Ministry of Finance. The Claims Conference and the German government have agreed to establish a working group to review the special plight of child survivors, defined as those born in 1928 or later.

Together, the Article 2 Fund and CEEF have paid approximately $3.5 billion to more than 109,000 Holocaust survivors since 1995. Both programs were created as a result of intensive Claims Conference negotiations with the German government.

The Claims Conference meets regularly with German government officials to negotiate changes to these and other programs so that additional Holocaust victims may receive compensation payments. Negotiations focus on expanding the criteria for compensation programs, so that the experiences of more Holocaust victims are recognized, and on increasing payment amounts.

The Claims Conference will continue to press other issues of concern in future negotiations with the German government.

The information here does not constitute a full and comprehensive description of the criteria of the Article 2 Fund or CEEF or of any amendments to this program. Eligibility criteria for Article 2 and CEEF payments are determined by the German government.

Parshas Vayishlach 5772

Shem Meshmuel, Copyright & copy 2011 by Rabbi Meir Tamari and Torah.org.
[Dr. Tamari is a renowned economist, Jewish scholar, and founder of the Center For Business Ethics (www.besr.org) in Jerusalem.]

"I have an ox and a donkey, flocks and men and maidservants" (Bereishit, 32:6). The midrash teaches that the ox is the Messiah ben Yoseph and the donkey is the Messiah ben David.

Rabbenu Tam in Sefer Hayashar explains that every individual has two parts, body and nefesh and these pursue two different directions; the body to the material and physical and the nefesh to spiritual grandeur and glory. In this regard the Master Menachem Mendel of Kotsk, taught that the essential part of the desire for glory can come only to a person who has already cleared themselves of appetites and desires. In its Galut, Israel sinks into material desires and is overcome by physical lusts, and the only way that they can be transformed is through their observance of the covenant, the personification of which is Yoseph. Therefore the first redemption comes through the Messiah of the House of Yoseph. Now they can enter the field of grandeur and glory. However, here there is the ever-present danger of arrogance and pride that can only be avoided or cured through the humility and modesty that characterize David. So, in order to be redeemed from this danger, Israel requires the Messiah of the Bet David. Then they may become like the sheep who have only one common voice and like the servants whose only task and pleasure is to serve their Master.

Shabbat represents the amalgamation of the role of the two messiahs. The nefesh yeteirah that we possess on this day, lusts after sanctity and desires kedushah, so that it is the opposite of material desires and appetites. Shabbat itself is Joseph, [just as the other festivals are represented by the Patriarchs, Moshe, Aharon and David], and therefore through the messiah of Ben Yoseph, Israel is able to divest themselves of worldly matters and physical needs on Shabbat. However, when this additional soul is elevated by this redemption, there is the danger of spiritual arrogance and self- delusion. [It must be borne in mind, that this danger of self delusion and arrogance that often accompanies religious observance, is a major motive throughout the whole Schcool of Pshyscha. Much of their teaching is geared to eradicate the danger and the Shem Mi Shmuel is no exception]. Since on Shabbat there is shevut, a cessation of work and the diminishing search for material existence, it brings with it the humility of the Messiah of David. So on Shabbat these two concepts, humility and the divesting of material matters, can be achieved simultaneously..

Chazal tell us that Yaakov wanted to bring Eisav to Teshuvah and Yaakov believed that that this could be done through the two messiahs: ox and donkey.
Yoseph is the Shor-Ox. By pulling the plough the ox breaks up the hard ground and turns over the soil thereby preparing it for the new crop. In the same way, the Messiah of Yoseph will destroy material evil, the arrogance of Eisav and prepare the world for redemption. He will destroy the power of Amalek as we know that he will only be defeated by the sons of Rachel [Yehoshua, Shaul and Mordechai], thereby he will break down the partitions that Amalek creates between Israel and God. This Messiah will shatter the heart of stone that lies over Israel. Since the Yetzer Harah is the Nachash that is Eisav, the destruction of Amalek will remove the Yetzer Harah from the world. Then, as we read in the midrash, the whole world will shelter beneath the Shechinah and a new spirit will rule in Heaven and over the kings on earth.(midras h Shir HaShirim, chapter 8).
Then, like the seed sown in the furrows, it will be possible for the Messiah the son of David riding on the donkey, to spread great heavenly light over Israel, give them a new heart and through humility spread Torah throughout the world so that all mankind would acknowledge the rule of God. By the Messiahs of Yoseph and of David the world will be so changed that Eisav will be able to rejoin his roots. This is why Yaakov sent to tell him that he has the ox and the donkey of the two messiahs.

The messengers-angels had to be sent to Har Seir, the homeland of Eisav. The Master, Menachem Mendel of Kotsk said that a person's spiritual roots express themselves in the place he chooses on earth. Eisav- Edom is arrogance and egoism, fixated with the power of his own glory. We saw this when Edom answered Moshe's request for permission to cross their territory (Bamidbar, 20: 18-20). He said, "You tell me of the promise you received from your Father and I answer you with the one I received from mine, 'By your sword shall you live' (Bereishit, 27:40). You tell me how Hashem heard your voice of Yaakov but the hands are the hands of Eisav "( Rashi). He is red with the bloodshed that follows arrogance and belief in one's own power and his inheritance is Edom, Red. Har Seir- Edom is that part of Eretz Yisrael that is temporarily given to Eisav and it is from here that he derives his arrogance and gasut ruach. Gasut ruach cannot be rectified by doing mitzvoth as the arrogance is only enhanced by its performance. Therefore the gasut ruach of Eisav, cannot be corrected but needs to be destroyed and eradicated. Then Har Seir will become part of the Nachlah of Israel, as promised to Avraham. So the angels had to be sent to Har Seir with the message of the two messiahs.

However, there is a further reason for the message of the angels.
This is a reflection of the angels of Eretz Yisrael, who ascended the ladder of Yaakov's dream, and those of Chutz La Aretz who descended in order to accompany him on his way to Haran. Now the roles were reversed when at Machanayim at the end of Vayeitzei, Yaakov saw the two camps of angels; one to greet him on his return and the other to say farewell. Those of Chutz La Aretz are Sur Mi Rah, cleansing the desires and needs of the body for material thing and achievements, while the angels of Eretz Yisrael are the striving for spiritual grandeur and glory through Asei Tov. The Talmud (Nedarim, 20a) and (Sanhedrin, 72a) tells us that the angels sent to Eisav relate to the scholars of Eretz Yisrael and to those of Bavel, who differed from each other in the manner of their holy service, a difference that reflected itself in their scholarship and interpersonal attitudes. The scholars of Eretz Yisrael whose whole w orship flowed from love and ecstasy, in turn made their relationships with each other and their interpersonal communications, one of love and tolerance. The scholars of Bavel whose worship was constantly aimed at Sur Mi Rah, even at their own shortcomings, developed a critical and contentious relationship with each other, thereby stressing their halakhic differences.

D'exceptionnels documents sur la Shoah à Bordeaux

Le centre Jean-Moulin propose une exposition inédite à voir absolument.
Une enseignante bordelaise en anthropologie a rassemblé des documents inédits par centaines.


Photo guillaume bonnaud/ sud ouest

L'autre jour, en sortant de l'expo du centre Jean-Moulin à Bordeaux, un jeune visiteur à la voix nouée disait à sa compagne : « Et dire qu'il y en a qui nient tout ça… »
Tout ça, ce sont les visages blêmes des femmes du ghetto de Varsovie, les nazis incendiaires qui posent devant les maisons juives qu'ils viennent d'incendier à Smolensk, les charniers des camps de concentration… Innombrables visages qui racontent la destruction des juifs sous le nazisme en Europe centrale, de l'Est, du Sud-Est et dans les pays Baltes. Les historiens ont déjà labouré le sujet ? Certes. Mais il s'agit ici de documents inédits, rassemblés par une enseignante bordelaise en anthropologie, Carole Lemée. L'ethno-historienne avait déjà consacré sa thèse à la mémoire de Vichy aujourd'hui et écrit un livre avec Juliette Benzazon, l'une des parties civiles du procès Papon. Dans le même temps, elle accumulait chez les brocanteurs, bouquinistes et autres antiquaires de toute l'Europe de l'Est des photos, des journaux, des papiers, que l'on trouve encore en abondance aujourd'hui, et qui sont autant de témoignages sensibles de l'ampleur de la Shoah.

Trois ans de préparatifs
Carole Lemée, qui a longtemps refusé toute exploitation de son fonds de travail, a mis trois ans à préparer cette exposition. Trois ans pour sélectionner 1 000 photos et 200 documents d'archives sur les 2 000 qu'elle a pu accumuler. Trois ans pour se replonger dans la littérature nazie de l'époque, jusqu'à en avoir la nausée, pour expliquer, expliquer, expliquer encore comment tout cela avait pu arriver. Et comment la destruction de la culture des juifs d'Europe avait précédé et accompagné à la fois leur extermination physique. Cet angle-là est, sinon inédit, du moins rare : « Personne ne parle de l'ethnocide, qui ne tombe pas il est vrai sous une qualification pénale, mais qui est bien le pivot d'où procède tout le reste dès 1933 », précise l'anthropologue.

L'exposition est amenée à tourner par la suite, mais sans doute pas avec les documents originaux, toujours fragiles. En attendant, il faut donc prendre le temps de lire les commentaires historiques brefs et denses, de regarder une à une les photos des ghettos et des camps, dont l'accumulation dit à elle seule l'ampleur systématique de l'Holocauste. Leur présentation ne recherche aucun effet. Ni mise en scène des atrocités, ni banalisation excessive. Un peu comme si les noms juifs inscrits sur les murs dressés en hommage aux victimes avaient enfin un visage.

Exposition « Survivre », du mardi au dimanche de 14 à 18 heures jusqu'au 8 avril, au centre Jean-Moulin, place Jean-Moulin, à Bordeaux (entrée libre).

Beaucoup de Juifs pensent que l’Amérique ne laissera pas détruire Israël....

Par Joëlle de Paris

1- GOLDA MEIR AVAIT RÉCLAMÉ LE BOMBARDEMENT D'AUSCHWITZ
-Par Laure Onno - Dimanche 4 septembre 2011 à 16:55 (GyusenTV)-
Le 3 septembre 1941, les nazis ont gazé à mort 850 prisonniers à Auschwitz. Pendant les trois années suivantes, on estime à 1,75 millions le nombre de prisonniers, juifs pour la plupart d’entre eux, qui ont été tués dans ces chambres à gaz.
En 1944, des leaders juifs ont demandé à l’administration Roosevelt de bombarder le camp ou ses chemins de fer. Ce qui n’était pas connu jusqu’à présent, c’est le fait que l’un d’eux était une jeune leader sioniste en Palestine britannique qui plus tard deviendra le Premier ministre le plus renommé : Golda Meir.
Les leaders juifs qui ont demandé le bombardement d'Auschwitz ont invariablement reçu une réponse en bloc du Secrétaire adjoint américain à la Guerre, John McCloy, clamant que cette requête était « irréalisable ».
Plus tard, une recherche du Professeur David S. Wyman a révélé que, en effet, en 1944 les avions américains ont à plusieurs reprises bombardé les points de pétrole allemands adjacents à Auschwitz, certains d’entre eux étant à moins de 8000 mètres des chambres à gaz.



2- DEPUIS TRENTE ANS, JAMES BAKER EST L’AME DU LOBBY ANTI-ISRAELIEN A WASHINGTON.
-Du site Debriefing.org par Michel Gurfinkiel-


Le Congrès penche vers Israël : en raison de la mobilisation de la communauté juive sans doute, mais aussi [parce que les États-Unis sont] un pays qui reste profondément attaché à la Bible et à une vision idéaliste de la démocratie, de la plus grande partie de l’opinion publique.
…En face, le lobby pétrolier a trouvé des alliés au Département d’Etat, traditionnellement pro-arabe ; dans des milieux marqués par les divers antisémitismes chrétiens, aussi bien protestant que catholique ou orthodoxe ; et aussi à l’extrême gauche, où l’"antisionisme", dans sa version tiers-mondiste, revue et corrigée par Noam Chomsky, devient un dogme.
Au milieu, la Maison Blanche oscille. Lyndon Johnson et Richard Nixon, relativement pro-Israéliens, laissent le Département d’Etat mener une politique relativement anti-israélienne. Secrétaire d’Etat à la fin de l’ère Nixon, puis sous le républicain Gerald Ford, Henry Kissinger bride ses sentiments pro-Israéliens, sauf pendant la guerre de Kippour, en 1973. Le démocrate Jimmy Carter (marqué par l’antijudaïsme baptiste) et son conseiller, Zbigniew Brzezinski (marqué par l’antisémitisme catholique, version polono-ukrainienne) sont anti-Israéliens. Le républicain Reagan est relativement pro-Israélien, mais son entourage comprend à la fois des pro-Israéliens convaincus, comme les secrétaires d’Etat, Alexander Haig, puis, George Shultz, et des anti-Israéliens résolus, comme le vice-président Bush, le secrétaire à la Défense, Caspar Weinberger, et enfin, Baker. Rétrospectivement, cette administration apparaît comme pro-israélienne. Mais, pendant un bref moment, durant l’été 1982, elle mènera une politique anti-israélienne d’une violence sans précédent…
Voyant que la guerre (du Golfe) est inévitable, il (Bush) donne aux pays pétroliers arabes trois assurances : Israël ne fera pas partie de la coalition internationale qui, sous commandement américain, libérera le Koweit ; quel que soit le sort de Saddam, les sunnites resteront au pouvoir en Irak ; et, une fois le Koweit libéré, la question israélienne sera réglée. Il tient parole. Non seulement Israël est exclu de la coalition, mais on lui interdit de riposter par lui-même quand l’Irak le bombarde avec des missiles balistiques Scud. …
Dans son rapport, Baker énumère plusieurs arguments pour relancer le processus de paix israélo-arabe. Le plus révélateur est celui-ci : "Les Israéliens, dans leur grande majorité, sont fatigués d’être une nation sans cesse en guerre". Et seraient donc prêts, désormais, à tous les compromis.
C’est, bien sûr, un contresens absolu. Les Israéliens n’aiment pas la guerre. Ils ne l’ont jamais aimée. Mais ils préfèrent la guerre au suicide. Ou à une nouvelle Shoah.
Mais pourquoi Baker commet-il un tel contresens ? Mon sentiment est qu’il se perd à nouveau dans des jeux de miroirs. De même qu’il a toujours projeté fantasmatiquement son propre lobby pétrolier sur le "lobby juif" , il plaque aujourd’hui sur Israël le refus de combattre qui est en fait le sien, et celui, hélas, d’une moitié de l’Occident.


3- ENREGISTREMENTS CHOQUANTS NIXON-KISSINGER : ET ALORS, SI LES SOVIÉTIQUES GAZENT LES JUIFS !
-Par Ben Tzvi Gedalyahu-

Le conseiller et secrétaire d'État Henry Kissinger à la Maison Blanche a dit jadis au président Richard Nixon, "Et si l'on met les Juifs dans les chambres à gaz en Union soviétique, ce n'est pas la préoccupation des Américains. Peut-être un souci humanitaire", selon les enregistrements récemment publiés par la bibliothèque Nixon.
La déclaration choquante de Kissinger, un Juif, fut complétée par un acquiescement de Nixon, qui a dit : "Je sais. On ne peut pas faire sauter le monde à cause de cela."